<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 310 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104044</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent-company, as it found the respondent&#039;s defense to be bona fide and substantial. The court concluded that the debt claimed was not definite or undisputed, and the respondent demonstrated financial capability to settle the disputed claims. The petitioners were allowed to pursue their claim in another forum if desired.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:27:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 310 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104044</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent-company, as it found the respondent&#039;s defense to be bona fide and substantial. The court concluded that the debt claimed was not definite or undisputed, and the respondent demonstrated financial capability to settle the disputed claims. The petitioners were allowed to pursue their claim in another forum if desired.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>