<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 436 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104040</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to verify if the PPF payment was made from income chargeable to tax in earlier years and allow the rebate accordingly. However, the denial of rebate for Life Insurance Premia was upheld due to lack of evidence, and the restriction of telephone expenses at 1/6th was deemed reasonable. The judgment provided a thorough analysis of legal provisions and precedents to support its decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:18:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 436 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104040</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to verify if the PPF payment was made from income chargeable to tax in earlier years and allow the rebate accordingly. However, the denial of rebate for Life Insurance Premia was upheld due to lack of evidence, and the restriction of telephone expenses at 1/6th was deemed reasonable. The judgment provided a thorough analysis of legal provisions and precedents to support its decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>