<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 405 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104015</link>
    <description>Section 8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act permits a State notification to grant further reduction or exemption, but it does not displace the statutory condition in section 8(4) requiring furnishing of C forms to claim the concessional rate under section 8. The notifications for edible oils reduced tax further and imposed conditions, yet they did not expressly waive the C form requirement where section 8(4) applied. The Supreme Court held that dealers could not rely on the exemption notifications without satisfying that precondition, while questions about the validity or genuineness of the forms were to be decided by the appropriate authorities in the pending proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 405 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104015</link>
      <description>Section 8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act permits a State notification to grant further reduction or exemption, but it does not displace the statutory condition in section 8(4) requiring furnishing of C forms to claim the concessional rate under section 8. The notifications for edible oils reduced tax further and imposed conditions, yet they did not expressly waive the C form requirement where section 8(4) applied. The Supreme Court held that dealers could not rely on the exemption notifications without satisfying that precondition, while questions about the validity or genuineness of the forms were to be decided by the appropriate authorities in the pending proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>