https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104006 Execution proceedings arising from an order creating a limited tenancy under the Delhi Rent Control Act are governed by the special statutory scheme and fall within the Rent Controller's exclusive jurisdiction. They are therefore not "other legal proceedings" under section 446(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, and no leave of the company court is required after winding up. The Rent Controller, acting under that special jurisdiction, is not a "court" for section 446(3), so the proceedings cannot be transferred to the company court. The controlling principle is that proceedings before a special tribunal of exclusive jurisdiction are outside the transfer and leave provisions of section 446. en-us Thu, 21 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:22:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104006 Execution proceedings arising from an order creating a limited tenancy under the Delhi Rent Control Act are governed by the special statutory scheme and fall within the Rent Controller's exclusive jurisdiction. They are therefore not "other legal proceedings" under section 446(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, and no leave of the company court is required after winding up. The Rent Controller, acting under that special jurisdiction, is not a "court" for section 446(3), so the proceedings cannot be transferred to the company court. The controlling principle is that proceedings before a special tribunal of exclusive jurisdiction are outside the transfer and leave provisions of section 446. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 21 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104006