<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 295 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103993</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeals, holding that cashew-nut kernels are not the same goods as raw cashew-nuts and thus do not qualify for exemption under Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The principles laid down in the Shanmugha Vilas case were found to be applicable, and the court concluded that the goods exported must be the same as those purchased to claim tax exemption. The appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 295 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103993</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeals, holding that cashew-nut kernels are not the same goods as raw cashew-nuts and thus do not qualify for exemption under Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The principles laid down in the Shanmugha Vilas case were found to be applicable, and the court concluded that the goods exported must be the same as those purchased to claim tax exemption. The appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>