https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103992 In an appeal under Section 70 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982, the time reasonably spent in obtaining a certified copy of an award must be excluded when computing limitation, because the award is not required to be communicated and the Limitation Act is not expressly or impliedly excluded. The proceedings under Chapter XII were treated as having the incidents of civil proceedings, and the principle underlying Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963, was applied to protect the appellant's right to frame effective grounds of challenge. The appeal was therefore treated as within time and the time-bar objection could not stand. en-us Thu, 18 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:33:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103992 In an appeal under Section 70 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982, the time reasonably spent in obtaining a certified copy of an award must be excluded when computing limitation, because the award is not required to be communicated and the Limitation Act is not expressly or impliedly excluded. The proceedings under Chapter XII were treated as having the incidents of civil proceedings, and the principle underlying Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963, was applied to protect the appellant's right to frame effective grounds of challenge. The appeal was therefore treated as within time and the time-bar objection could not stand. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 18 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103992