https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103974 Judicial directions restraining arrest and fixing the venue, timing, and manner of interrogation in a serious FERA investigation were unjustified because they impeded the investigating agency's control over a continuing statutory inquiry. The Court emphasised that pre-arrest bail stands on different considerations from post-arrest bail, and that blanket protection against arrest, together with supervision of interrogation logistics, can reduce interrogation to a formality. The seriousness of the allegations and the accused's prior conduct were not properly weighed. The anticipatory bail order and the related restraints were therefore held unsustainable. en-us Fri, 28 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Dec 2025 11:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103974 Judicial directions restraining arrest and fixing the venue, timing, and manner of interrogation in a serious FERA investigation were unjustified because they impeded the investigating agency's control over a continuing statutory inquiry. The Court emphasised that pre-arrest bail stands on different considerations from post-arrest bail, and that blanket protection against arrest, together with supervision of interrogation logistics, can reduce interrogation to a formality. The seriousness of the allegations and the accused's prior conduct were not properly weighed. The anticipatory bail order and the related restraints were therefore held unsustainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 28 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103974