https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103969 An earlier final order was held to contain a mistake apparent on the face of the record because it relied on condition No. (i) of para 2 of Notification No. 8/99-C.E., which had already been omitted by Notification No. 16/99-C.E. for the relevant period. On that basis, the Tribunal accepted that the order had proceeded on a condition no longer in force and treated the error as rectifiable. The rectification application was allowed and the earlier order was recalled, without examining the other alleged mistakes raised in the application. en-us Fri, 01 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:02:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103969 An earlier final order was held to contain a mistake apparent on the face of the record because it relied on condition No. (i) of para 2 of Notification No. 8/99-C.E., which had already been omitted by Notification No. 16/99-C.E. for the relevant period. On that basis, the Tribunal accepted that the order had proceeded on a condition no longer in force and treated the error as rectifiable. The rectification application was allowed and the earlier order was recalled, without examining the other alleged mistakes raised in the application. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103969