<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1071 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103965</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on scrap inputs was held inadmissible because the manufacturer failed to prove actual receipt of the inputs in the factory and their use in the manufacture of steel ingots. The transport documents were disowned by the named transporters, two transport agencies were found non-existent, and no reliable transport or corroborative evidence was produced to establish movement of goods. There was also no satisfactory correlation between the alleged scrap inputs and the finished ingots recorded in the books, and the claim of payment by cheque or draft was not substantiated. The ruling confirms that actual receipt and utilisation of inputs are necessary conditions for Modvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:00:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1071 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103965</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on scrap inputs was held inadmissible because the manufacturer failed to prove actual receipt of the inputs in the factory and their use in the manufacture of steel ingots. The transport documents were disowned by the named transporters, two transport agencies were found non-existent, and no reliable transport or corroborative evidence was produced to establish movement of goods. There was also no satisfactory correlation between the alleged scrap inputs and the finished ingots recorded in the books, and the claim of payment by cheque or draft was not substantiated. The ruling confirms that actual receipt and utilisation of inputs are necessary conditions for Modvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>