<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 286 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103961</link>
    <description>A writ of prohibition cannot be issued to stop a statutory appellate authority from performing lawful quasi-judicial functions unless it acts without jurisdiction, in breach of natural justice, under an unconstitutional law, or in violation of fundamental rights. The High Court&#039;s wide writ jurisdiction under article 226 does not extend to disabling a statutory authority from deciding pending appeals or transferring those matters to another forum merely because of external pressure. The writ petition seeking such relief was therefore not maintainable, and the appellate authority was entitled to continue exercising its statutory powers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 286 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103961</link>
      <description>A writ of prohibition cannot be issued to stop a statutory appellate authority from performing lawful quasi-judicial functions unless it acts without jurisdiction, in breach of natural justice, under an unconstitutional law, or in violation of fundamental rights. The High Court&#039;s wide writ jurisdiction under article 226 does not extend to disabling a statutory authority from deciding pending appeals or transferring those matters to another forum merely because of external pressure. The writ petition seeking such relief was therefore not maintainable, and the appellate authority was entitled to continue exercising its statutory powers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>