<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 327 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103953</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application under section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking punishment for ex-Directors of a company for failing to submit the company&#039;s affairs statement within the stipulated period. The court found that the Managing Director, who ceased to be a Director before the relevant date, submitted the records and statement later, while other non-applicants faced difficulties due to the Managing Director withholding records. Considering the circumstances and disputes within the company, the court concluded that there was a reasonable excuse for the delay and discharged the non-applicants from any liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:48:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 327 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103953</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application under section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking punishment for ex-Directors of a company for failing to submit the company&#039;s affairs statement within the stipulated period. The court found that the Managing Director, who ceased to be a Director before the relevant date, submitted the records and statement later, while other non-applicants faced difficulties due to the Managing Director withholding records. Considering the circumstances and disputes within the company, the court concluded that there was a reasonable excuse for the delay and discharged the non-applicants from any liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>