<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1058 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103950</link>
    <description>The small scale industry exemption under Notification No. 1/93 was applied on the clearance value as a whole, so eligibility to the concession was determined up to the prescribed value limit and duty was payable only on the excess. The analysis rejected splitting a single consignment for assessment at different rates and followed earlier co-ordinate Bench decisions treating that approach as settled. The result stated was that the exemption remained available up to the threshold, with duty confined to the value above it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:43:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1058 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103950</link>
      <description>The small scale industry exemption under Notification No. 1/93 was applied on the clearance value as a whole, so eligibility to the concession was determined up to the prescribed value limit and duty was payable only on the excess. The analysis rejected splitting a single consignment for assessment at different rates and followed earlier co-ordinate Bench decisions treating that approach as settled. The result stated was that the exemption remained available up to the threshold, with duty confined to the value above it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>