<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 323 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103948</link>
    <description>A defendant before the Debt Recovery Tribunal may object to defects in an original application after registration, but such objection matters only if the alleged defect prejudices the defence. Section 22 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1995 allows the Tribunal to regulate procedure on principles of natural justice, and that power includes permitting the applicant to cure procedural irregularities. Where the defect does not cause real prejudice, the Tribunal may allow correction rather than reject the application. The alleged absence of translated copies of Telugu documents did not justify interference because translations were to be supplied at trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:42:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 323 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103948</link>
      <description>A defendant before the Debt Recovery Tribunal may object to defects in an original application after registration, but such objection matters only if the alleged defect prejudices the defence. Section 22 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1995 allows the Tribunal to regulate procedure on principles of natural justice, and that power includes permitting the applicant to cure procedural irregularities. Where the defect does not cause real prejudice, the Tribunal may allow correction rather than reject the application. The alleged absence of translated copies of Telugu documents did not justify interference because translations were to be supplied at trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>