<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 318 - HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103939</link>
    <description>A prompt and bona fide attempt to pursue setting aside of an ex parte order justified condonation of delay, allowing the matter to be heard on merits. Disputes concerning purchase and sale of shares, along with refund of invested money, were treated as capable of falling within consumer jurisdiction where services were rendered for consideration. Territorial jurisdiction was upheld because the transactions and payment of money occurred at Hissar, and the availability of other forums did not exclude that forum&#039;s jurisdiction. The consumer complaints remained maintainable, and the District Forum&#039;s orders were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 318 - HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103939</link>
      <description>A prompt and bona fide attempt to pursue setting aside of an ex parte order justified condonation of delay, allowing the matter to be heard on merits. Disputes concerning purchase and sale of shares, along with refund of invested money, were treated as capable of falling within consumer jurisdiction where services were rendered for consideration. Territorial jurisdiction was upheld because the transactions and payment of money occurred at Hissar, and the availability of other forums did not exclude that forum&#039;s jurisdiction. The consumer complaints remained maintainable, and the District Forum&#039;s orders were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>