<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1040 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103930</link>
    <description>Repacking from bulk packs was treated as manufacture under the relevant tariff note, and the text states that duty demanded on such repacked goods should be re-quantified after allowing Modvat credit on eligible inputs, thereby reducing the net liability. It also states that where repacking and reprocessing were carried out within a factory already registered with Central Excise and the area was disclosed in the approved plan, a separate registration was unnecessary, so denial of Modvat credit on that ground was not justified. The corresponding duty demand and penalty based on absence of separate registration were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:15:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1040 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103930</link>
      <description>Repacking from bulk packs was treated as manufacture under the relevant tariff note, and the text states that duty demanded on such repacked goods should be re-quantified after allowing Modvat credit on eligible inputs, thereby reducing the net liability. It also states that where repacking and reprocessing were carried out within a factory already registered with Central Excise and the area was disclosed in the approved plan, a separate registration was unnecessary, so denial of Modvat credit on that ground was not justified. The corresponding duty demand and penalty based on absence of separate registration were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>