<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1039 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103929</link>
    <description>Condonation of a 16-day delay in filing the Modvat declaration under Rule 57G, followed by acceptance of the declaration and grant of credit, regularised the earlier lapse. Once the delayed declaration was acted upon, the alleged contravention no longer survived, so the basis for penalty under Rule 173Q disappeared. The penal order was therefore unsustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:13:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1039 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103929</link>
      <description>Condonation of a 16-day delay in filing the Modvat declaration under Rule 57G, followed by acceptance of the declaration and grant of credit, regularised the earlier lapse. Once the delayed declaration was acted upon, the alleged contravention no longer survived, so the basis for penalty under Rule 173Q disappeared. The penal order was therefore unsustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>