https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103927 Delay in filing the appeal was not condoned because the appellant's explanation was found unsatisfactory. The delay was about seven months, and the claim that the order took time to reach the concerned officer in a large organisation was rejected since the order had been sent to the correct address provided by the appellant. On these facts, the Tribunal held that sufficient cause was not established and refused condonation. en-us Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:12:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103927 Delay in filing the appeal was not condoned because the appellant's explanation was found unsatisfactory. The delay was about seven months, and the claim that the order took time to reach the concerned officer in a large organisation was rejected since the order had been sent to the correct address provided by the appellant. On these facts, the Tribunal held that sufficient cause was not established and refused condonation. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103927