<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1025 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103916</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was held inadmissible where the assessee entered the credit only in RG 23A Part II without the corresponding entry in Part I and without proof of receipt and consumption of the goods in manufacture. The scheme under Rule 57G(7) required maintenance of both registers, and the omission in Part I was not shown to be a mere clerical error. Earlier decisions were distinguished because they involved substantive compliance with only a mistaken register entry. The demand confirmed by the lower authorities was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:35:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1025 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103916</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was held inadmissible where the assessee entered the credit only in RG 23A Part II without the corresponding entry in Part I and without proof of receipt and consumption of the goods in manufacture. The scheme under Rule 57G(7) required maintenance of both registers, and the omission in Part I was not shown to be a mere clerical error. Earlier decisions were distinguished because they involved substantive compliance with only a mistaken register entry. The demand confirmed by the lower authorities was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>