<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1024 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103915</link>
    <description>Rule 8 valuation of imported goods must be based on reasonable means consistent with Section 14 of the Customs Act and cannot rest on arbitrary enhancement. Where the Revenue fixes an assessable value without disclosing the basis and the valuation is technically disputed, the determination lacks adequate support. In such circumstances, the matter must be redetermined by the Adjudicating Authority after disclosure of the valuation basis and consideration of technical expert opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:31:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1024 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103915</link>
      <description>Rule 8 valuation of imported goods must be based on reasonable means consistent with Section 14 of the Customs Act and cannot rest on arbitrary enhancement. Where the Revenue fixes an assessable value without disclosing the basis and the valuation is technically disputed, the determination lacks adequate support. In such circumstances, the matter must be redetermined by the Adjudicating Authority after disclosure of the valuation basis and consideration of technical expert opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>