<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 431 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103896</link>
    <description>The court allowed the applicant-bank, the largest secured creditor, to continue recovery proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal with specified conditions to protect the interests of all parties involved. The court emphasized the importance of safeguarding the rights of secured creditors and workmen. The company petition was disposed of without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:38:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 431 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103896</link>
      <description>The court allowed the applicant-bank, the largest secured creditor, to continue recovery proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal with specified conditions to protect the interests of all parties involved. The court emphasized the importance of safeguarding the rights of secured creditors and workmen. The company petition was disposed of without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>