<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 423 - DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103883</link>
    <description>The Commission found the Bank guilty of deficiency in service for delaying the return of an unsigned cheque, awarding token damages of Rs. 500 to the complainant. On appeal, the compensation was increased to Rs. 5,000 as the delay caused a significant loss due to market price fluctuations. The Bank was directed to pay within four weeks, emphasizing the importance of timely banking services to protect customers&#039; financial interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:30:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 423 - DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103883</link>
      <description>The Commission found the Bank guilty of deficiency in service for delaying the return of an unsigned cheque, awarding token damages of Rs. 500 to the complainant. On appeal, the compensation was increased to Rs. 5,000 as the delay caused a significant loss due to market price fluctuations. The Bank was directed to pay within four weeks, emphasizing the importance of timely banking services to protect customers&#039; financial interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>