<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 985 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103877</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because gate passes were issued before 1-4-1994 and endorsed later, as the relevant documents remained valid for credit. The lower appellate authority had allowed the credit by following an earlier Tribunal ruling, and the Board&#039;s circular had already ed the Gujarat High Court view supporting that position. The mere pendency of reference petitions on the same issue did not justify departing from the settled interpretation. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and denial of credit was not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:23:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 985 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103877</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because gate passes were issued before 1-4-1994 and endorsed later, as the relevant documents remained valid for credit. The lower appellate authority had allowed the credit by following an earlier Tribunal ruling, and the Board&#039;s circular had already ed the Gujarat High Court view supporting that position. The mere pendency of reference petitions on the same issue did not justify departing from the settled interpretation. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and denial of credit was not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>