https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103865 Service of statutory notice under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was treated as duly proved because the affidavits and supporting documents showed issuance and service on the accused directors and officers before the complaints were filed; the challenge of non-service therefore failed. A complaint filed in the name of a company and signed by its administrative manager did not require separate express authorisation, since a company acts through its officers and no special authority is needed where the company itself is the named complainant. The complaints were held maintainable and proceedings under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were allowed to continue. en-us Thu, 03 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:10:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103865 Service of statutory notice under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was treated as duly proved because the affidavits and supporting documents showed issuance and service on the accused directors and officers before the complaints were filed; the challenge of non-service therefore failed. A complaint filed in the name of a company and signed by its administrative manager did not require separate express authorisation, since a company acts through its officers and no special authority is needed where the company itself is the named complainant. The complaints were held maintainable and proceedings under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were allowed to continue. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 03 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103865