https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103863 A Chief Justice's notification issued under paragraph 14 of the Amalgamation Order was treated as validly excluding company matters from the Lucknow Bench and requiring such petitions to be filed and heard at Allahabad. The expression excluding the "exercise of jurisdiction and power" was held broad enough to cover both institution and hearing of company cases. The earlier Nasiruddin ruling was distinguished as dealing with territorial demarcation and not undermining the notification, which had long been acted upon. Even on a narrower reading, filing at Allahabad was treated as a technical defect causing no prejudice or failure of justice, so the maintainability objection failed and the petition was held maintainable at Allahabad. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:07:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103863 A Chief Justice's notification issued under paragraph 14 of the Amalgamation Order was treated as validly excluding company matters from the Lucknow Bench and requiring such petitions to be filed and heard at Allahabad. The expression excluding the "exercise of jurisdiction and power" was held broad enough to cover both institution and hearing of company cases. The earlier Nasiruddin ruling was distinguished as dealing with territorial demarcation and not undermining the notification, which had long been acted upon. Even on a narrower reading, filing at Allahabad was treated as a technical defect causing no prejudice or failure of justice, so the maintainability objection failed and the petition was held maintainable at Allahabad. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 02 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103863