https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103861 A writ court should not overturn a supported factual finding unless it is unsupported by evidence or so perverse that no reasonable person could reach it. Here, the Deputy Commissioner's conclusion that the seized goods were not being transported to the city booking agency rested on several circumstances, including the absence of supporting documents, octroi payment, the manner of transport, and material from railway officials. The High Court interfered without addressing all the reasons underlying that finding. The Supreme Court held that such interference was unjustified and that the factual finding should have been left undisturbed. en-us Mon, 21 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Dec 2016 15:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103861 A writ court should not overturn a supported factual finding unless it is unsupported by evidence or so perverse that no reasonable person could reach it. Here, the Deputy Commissioner's conclusion that the seized goods were not being transported to the city booking agency rested on several circumstances, including the absence of supporting documents, octroi payment, the manner of transport, and material from railway officials. The High Court interfered without addressing all the reasons underlying that finding. The Supreme Court held that such interference was unjustified and that the factual finding should have been left undisturbed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 21 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103861