<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 368 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103853</link>
    <description>The court found that the company was not unable to pay its debts as it was financially sound and the liability was genuinely disputed. Consequently, the request for winding up the company was denied. However, the court ordered the company to furnish a bank guarantee for the claimed amounts within four weeks, enabling the petitioners to enforce the guarantee if they prove their claims in subsequent proceedings. The company petitions were resolved accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:57:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 368 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103853</link>
      <description>The court found that the company was not unable to pay its debts as it was financially sound and the liability was genuinely disputed. Consequently, the request for winding up the company was denied. However, the court ordered the company to furnish a bank guarantee for the claimed amounts within four weeks, enabling the petitioners to enforce the guarantee if they prove their claims in subsequent proceedings. The company petitions were resolved accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>