<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 259 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103832</link>
    <description>Section 4(1) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 was treated as the general charging provision for both sales and purchases, subject to express exemptions. Section 6 was held to exempt only the sale of Schedule B goods, including agricultural produce sold by the grower, and not their purchase. Section 4-B was construed as a provision for specified purchase-tax situations involving goods other than Schedule B goods, and did not displace the general levy or create an implied exemption. The definition of &quot;purchase&quot; in section 2(ff) was read broadly. Purchase tax was therefore payable on sugarcane purchased by sugar mills.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 259 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103832</link>
      <description>Section 4(1) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 was treated as the general charging provision for both sales and purchases, subject to express exemptions. Section 6 was held to exempt only the sale of Schedule B goods, including agricultural produce sold by the grower, and not their purchase. Section 4-B was construed as a provision for specified purchase-tax situations involving goods other than Schedule B goods, and did not displace the general levy or create an implied exemption. The definition of &quot;purchase&quot; in section 2(ff) was read broadly. Purchase tax was therefore payable on sugarcane purchased by sugar mills.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>