<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 570 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103808</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be finally disallowed without first deciding the assessee&#039;s pending request for condonation of delay under Rule 57G(9) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Where the assessee had filed the declaration belatedly and sought condonation before adjudication, the authority was required to consider that request before rejecting credit, especially when compliance with Rule 57G(5) was asserted. The Tribunal upheld the appellate order setting aside the original disallowance and directing de novo adjudication, finding no illegality in that course. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:54:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 570 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103808</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be finally disallowed without first deciding the assessee&#039;s pending request for condonation of delay under Rule 57G(9) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Where the assessee had filed the declaration belatedly and sought condonation before adjudication, the authority was required to consider that request before rejecting credit, especially when compliance with Rule 57G(5) was asserted. The Tribunal upheld the appellate order setting aside the original disallowance and directing de novo adjudication, finding no illegality in that course. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>