<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 418 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103800</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed both appeals filed by Corporation Bank, a secured creditor seeking recovery through civil suits in the High Court of Delhi. The court set aside the decision to transfer the suits to another High Court, emphasizing the avoidance of unnecessary expenses for the appellant. It was held that the convenience of the official liquidator should not be the sole consideration, and each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:43:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 418 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103800</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed both appeals filed by Corporation Bank, a secured creditor seeking recovery through civil suits in the High Court of Delhi. The court set aside the decision to transfer the suits to another High Court, emphasizing the avoidance of unnecessary expenses for the appellant. It was held that the convenience of the official liquidator should not be the sole consideration, and each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>