<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 476 - HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103797</link>
    <description>The court declined the plaintiffs&#039; request for an interim injunction, citing their failure to establish a prima facie case, lack of balance of convenience in their favor, and absence of irreparable loss or injury from denying the injunction. The application for interim injunction was dismissed without costs, with the court specifying that its findings would not impact the final decision of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:41:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 476 - HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103797</link>
      <description>The court declined the plaintiffs&#039; request for an interim injunction, citing their failure to establish a prima facie case, lack of balance of convenience in their favor, and absence of irreparable loss or injury from denying the injunction. The application for interim injunction was dismissed without costs, with the court specifying that its findings would not impact the final decision of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>