<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 391 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103791</link>
    <description>The appeal under section 483 of the Companies Act, challenging the dismissal of an application under section 446 for continuation of execution proceedings after winding up, was dismissed. The court interpreted sections 441 and 537 of the Act, determining that the commencement of winding up dates back to the petition filing and any sale post-commencement without court permission is void. Relying on legal principles from past cases, the court upheld the respondent&#039;s position, emphasizing the sale&#039;s invalidity after winding up commencement. The appeal was rejected based on the correct application of relevant Companies Act sections and legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:32:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 391 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103791</link>
      <description>The appeal under section 483 of the Companies Act, challenging the dismissal of an application under section 446 for continuation of execution proceedings after winding up, was dismissed. The court interpreted sections 441 and 537 of the Act, determining that the commencement of winding up dates back to the petition filing and any sale post-commencement without court permission is void. Relying on legal principles from past cases, the court upheld the respondent&#039;s position, emphasizing the sale&#039;s invalidity after winding up commencement. The appeal was rejected based on the correct application of relevant Companies Act sections and legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>