https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103790 Possession of an employer-linked flat, where accommodation formed a primary service consideration, did not by itself establish a prima facie offence under Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Court found that the accused had not resigned or joined other employment, the employer itself had treated the employment as ended, and the material did not show wrongful retention of company property. It also noted that the flat had later been purchased by the accused and that the company had no independent right, title, or interest in it. On these facts, the criminal complaint was not fit to disturb the discharge order. en-us Fri, 27 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103790 Possession of an employer-linked flat, where accommodation formed a primary service consideration, did not by itself establish a prima facie offence under Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Court found that the accused had not resigned or joined other employment, the employer itself had treated the employment as ended, and the material did not show wrongful retention of company property. It also noted that the flat had later been purchased by the accused and that the company had no independent right, title, or interest in it. On these facts, the criminal complaint was not fit to disturb the discharge order. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 27 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103790