<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 687 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103780</link>
    <description>Aluminium extruded profiles claimed for use in a humidification plant were not shown to satisfy the requirements for capital goods under the Modvat scheme. The record did not satisfactorily establish how the items were used in the plant, and they appeared to be construction materials rather than eligible capital goods. As the assessee failed to answer the specific query on their use, the claim for Modvat credit was rejected and the denial of credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:02:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 687 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103780</link>
      <description>Aluminium extruded profiles claimed for use in a humidification plant were not shown to satisfy the requirements for capital goods under the Modvat scheme. The record did not satisfactorily establish how the items were used in the plant, and they appeared to be construction materials rather than eligible capital goods. As the assessee failed to answer the specific query on their use, the claim for Modvat credit was rejected and the denial of credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>