https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103754 A Government company with overwhelmingly State-linked shareholding, deep and pervasive governmental control, public-function objectives, and government-dominated management was treated as an instrumentality of the State and therefore fell within Article 12. A transfer made under service terms permitting posting anywhere was not interfered with because the employee failed to prove mala fides, arbitrariness, victimisation, or breach of statutory rules; the alleged hostile circumstances were unproved or too remote, and transfer remained an ordinary incident of service. en-us Wed, 12 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:32:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103754 A Government company with overwhelmingly State-linked shareholding, deep and pervasive governmental control, public-function objectives, and government-dominated management was treated as an instrumentality of the State and therefore fell within Article 12. A transfer made under service terms permitting posting anywhere was not interfered with because the employee failed to prove mala fides, arbitrariness, victimisation, or breach of statutory rules; the alleged hostile circumstances were unproved or too remote, and transfer remained an ordinary incident of service. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 12 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103754