https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103748 The court dismissed the review application, upholding the appointment of the provisional liquidator as just and necessary to safeguard creditors' interests and prevent asset depletion. Specific directives were given to the provisional liquidator to facilitate the company's pursuit of matters before appropriate forums, emphasizing transparency and asset protection. The court found no merit in the challenges raised regarding lack of notice and hearing, justifying the appointment based on the company's financial situation and conduct. en-us Mon, 03 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:10:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103748 The court dismissed the review application, upholding the appointment of the provisional liquidator as just and necessary to safeguard creditors' interests and prevent asset depletion. Specific directives were given to the provisional liquidator to facilitate the company's pursuit of matters before appropriate forums, emphasizing transparency and asset protection. The court found no merit in the challenges raised regarding lack of notice and hearing, justifying the appointment based on the company's financial situation and conduct. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 03 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103748