<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 237 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103718</link>
    <description>In fiscal matters, the State may distinguish between classes of goods on relevant social, economic, administrative and fiscal grounds, and such differentiation is not arbitrary if it has a rational basis. The article further notes that a prospective decision not to continue a sales tax exemption beyond a stated period does not amount to retrospective withdrawal or retrospective levy. It also states that an unproved promise to continue the exemption for a fixed period cannot sustain a promissory estoppel claim without a factual foundation. On those principles, the challenge to ending the brick industry exemption failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 237 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103718</link>
      <description>In fiscal matters, the State may distinguish between classes of goods on relevant social, economic, administrative and fiscal grounds, and such differentiation is not arbitrary if it has a rational basis. The article further notes that a prospective decision not to continue a sales tax exemption beyond a stated period does not amount to retrospective withdrawal or retrospective levy. It also states that an unproved promise to continue the exemption for a fixed period cannot sustain a promissory estoppel claim without a factual foundation. On those principles, the challenge to ending the brick industry exemption failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>