<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 493 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103709</link>
    <description>Factories that are in substance owned and controlled by the Central Government fall within the Government-factory deeming rule in the first proviso to section 2(n) of the Factories Act, 1948, because the definition of &quot;occupier&quot; turns on ultimate control over the factory&#039;s affairs. The special treatment for Government-owned or Government-controlled factories prevails over the general company rule, so the person appointed by the Central Government to manage such a factory is the deemed occupier. The contrary view applying the company provision was rejected, and the factories concerned were treated as Government-controlled for identifying the occupier.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 493 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103709</link>
      <description>Factories that are in substance owned and controlled by the Central Government fall within the Government-factory deeming rule in the first proviso to section 2(n) of the Factories Act, 1948, because the definition of &quot;occupier&quot; turns on ultimate control over the factory&#039;s affairs. The special treatment for Government-owned or Government-controlled factories prevails over the general company rule, so the person appointed by the Central Government to manage such a factory is the deemed occupier. The contrary view applying the company provision was rejected, and the factories concerned were treated as Government-controlled for identifying the occupier.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>