<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 491 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103706</link>
    <description>Advertisement charges incurred for the proposed sale of a company&#039;s flats were treated as a consequence of an ad interim order that stayed the sale process during pendency of the company application. Because the sale failed due to that judicial restraint, the resulting expenses could not be recovered from the noticee in separate recovery proceedings. Any liability arising from the interim order had to be considered, if at all, in the proceedings in which the order was made, rather than through an independent claim against the applicant who sought the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:23:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 491 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103706</link>
      <description>Advertisement charges incurred for the proposed sale of a company&#039;s flats were treated as a consequence of an ad interim order that stayed the sale process during pendency of the company application. Because the sale failed due to that judicial restraint, the resulting expenses could not be recovered from the noticee in separate recovery proceedings. Any liability arising from the interim order had to be considered, if at all, in the proceedings in which the order was made, rather than through an independent claim against the applicant who sought the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>