<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 800 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103700</link>
    <description>Modvat credit admissibility was examined for asbestos rope lagging used to seal and insulate a kiln under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules. The issue centred on whether such material qualified for credit as eligible capital goods or an admissible input under the rule. Because conflicting views existed on the point, the matter was referred to a Larger Bench for resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:19:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 800 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103700</link>
      <description>Modvat credit admissibility was examined for asbestos rope lagging used to seal and insulate a kiln under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules. The issue centred on whether such material qualified for credit as eligible capital goods or an admissible input under the rule. Because conflicting views existed on the point, the matter was referred to a Larger Bench for resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>