<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 341 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103673</link>
    <description>A co-operative housing society&#039;s eviction dispute against an occupant in unauthorised occupation falls within section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, because such proceedings touch the society&#039;s business and seek recovery of possession of society premises; pending rent law proceedings do not oust that jurisdiction. The Court also found no material to show conversion of an unregistered association into the appellant-company or any agreement creating tenancy in its favour, so the company could not claim tenant rights merely on asserted continuity with the earlier association. The rejection of the jurisdictional objection and the appellant&#039;s succession claim was upheld, and the eviction award stood.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2014 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 341 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103673</link>
      <description>A co-operative housing society&#039;s eviction dispute against an occupant in unauthorised occupation falls within section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, because such proceedings touch the society&#039;s business and seek recovery of possession of society premises; pending rent law proceedings do not oust that jurisdiction. The Court also found no material to show conversion of an unregistered association into the appellant-company or any agreement creating tenancy in its favour, so the company could not claim tenant rights merely on asserted continuity with the earlier association. The rejection of the jurisdictional objection and the appellant&#039;s succession claim was upheld, and the eviction award stood.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>