<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 865 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103668</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was treated as sufficiently explained where the office was being shifted, the relevant order and papers were misplaced during the move, and the appeal was filed promptly after recovery of the documents. On those facts, sufficient cause was accepted for condonation. The delay was condoned and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:23:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 865 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103668</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was treated as sufficiently explained where the office was being shifted, the relevant order and papers were misplaced during the move, and the appeal was filed promptly after recovery of the documents. On those facts, sufficient cause was accepted for condonation. The delay was condoned and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>