<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 333 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103662</link>
    <description>The court held that the Company Law Board (CLB) can issue directions under Section 248 of the Companies Act without any other proceedings pending before it. It clarified that an application seeking investigation under Section 248 without seeking further relief is valid. The court also determined that Sections 247 and 248 operate in different fields, with Section 247 having a broader scope. The court emphasized that the CLB must assess the merit of the material before ordering an investigation under Section 248. Additionally, the court explained the interconnection of Sections 247, 248, 249, and 250, allowing the CLB to issue interim orders to support investigations. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded back to the CLB for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:16:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 333 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103662</link>
      <description>The court held that the Company Law Board (CLB) can issue directions under Section 248 of the Companies Act without any other proceedings pending before it. It clarified that an application seeking investigation under Section 248 without seeking further relief is valid. The court also determined that Sections 247 and 248 operate in different fields, with Section 247 having a broader scope. The court emphasized that the CLB must assess the merit of the material before ordering an investigation under Section 248. Additionally, the court explained the interconnection of Sections 247, 248, 249, and 250, allowing the CLB to issue interim orders to support investigations. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded back to the CLB for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>