<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 852 - cegat, mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103656</link>
    <description>Where a show cause notice has already been finally adjudicated and dropped, a later order passed on the same notice, involving the same duty demand and import licence particulars, has no legal effect because the same cause of action cannot be adjudicated twice. The second adjudication was therefore void ab initio and unsustainable as a nullity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:05:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 852 - cegat, mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103656</link>
      <description>Where a show cause notice has already been finally adjudicated and dropped, a later order passed on the same notice, involving the same duty demand and import licence particulars, has no legal effect because the same cause of action cannot be adjudicated twice. The second adjudication was therefore void ab initio and unsustainable as a nullity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>