https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103633 Sanction under section 197 CrPC was held unnecessary for employees and a director of a Government-owned company because their removal was not dependent solely on Government sanction. In the cheque dishonour complaints, the Court held that section 258 CrPC did not apply to private complaints, the complaints disclosed the ingredients of section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and preliminary objections on authorisation, alleged joint complaint, security cheques, and stop-payment instruction did not defeat prosecution at the threshold. The discharge order was therefore unsustainable, and the complaints were restored for trial on merits. en-us Wed, 01 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:12:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103633 Sanction under section 197 CrPC was held unnecessary for employees and a director of a Government-owned company because their removal was not dependent solely on Government sanction. In the cheque dishonour complaints, the Court held that section 258 CrPC did not apply to private complaints, the complaints disclosed the ingredients of section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and preliminary objections on authorisation, alleged joint complaint, security cheques, and stop-payment instruction did not defeat prosecution at the threshold. The discharge order was therefore unsustainable, and the complaints were restored for trial on merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 01 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103633