<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 545 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103632</link>
    <description>The Companies Act, 1956 permits reduction of share capital by special resolution with court confirmation, including extinguishment of liability on unpaid or partly paid shares, provided the procedure is lawful. The court must also be satisfied that creditors are protected, dissenting shareholders are not unfairly prejudiced, and the scheme is fair and equitable before confirming the reduction and any consequential alteration of the memorandum of association. The text notes that these safeguards were treated as satisfied where disputed creditor dues were secured, no shareholder objection was shown, and the reduction was considered beneficial and non-prejudicial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:11:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 545 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103632</link>
      <description>The Companies Act, 1956 permits reduction of share capital by special resolution with court confirmation, including extinguishment of liability on unpaid or partly paid shares, provided the procedure is lawful. The court must also be satisfied that creditors are protected, dissenting shareholders are not unfairly prejudiced, and the scheme is fair and equitable before confirming the reduction and any consequential alteration of the memorandum of association. The text notes that these safeguards were treated as satisfied where disputed creditor dues were secured, no shareholder objection was shown, and the reduction was considered beneficial and non-prejudicial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>