https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103618 Section 113, as discussed, contemplates action on the application of the person entitled to receive share certificates, so the grievance belongs to the affected shareholder rather than the Registrar of Companies. In the absence of any shareholder complaint or application, prosecution for alleged default in dispatching share certificates is not maintainable at the instance of the Registrar. The text also notes that a delayed complaint for an offence punishable with fine only is liable to be rejected as time-barred where no application to excuse delay is filed and the delay is not otherwise justified. The revision was therefore not examined on merits and the dismissal of the complaint remained undisturbed. en-us Tue, 17 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:27:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103618 Section 113, as discussed, contemplates action on the application of the person entitled to receive share certificates, so the grievance belongs to the affected shareholder rather than the Registrar of Companies. In the absence of any shareholder complaint or application, prosecution for alleged default in dispatching share certificates is not maintainable at the instance of the Registrar. The text also notes that a delayed complaint for an offence punishable with fine only is liable to be rejected as time-barred where no application to excuse delay is filed and the delay is not otherwise justified. The revision was therefore not examined on merits and the dismissal of the complaint remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 17 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103618