<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1012 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103610</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside as the tribunal ruled that the rail length of the gallery should not be included in calculating factory capacity, overturning a previous decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:50:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1012 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103610</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside as the tribunal ruled that the rail length of the gallery should not be included in calculating factory capacity, overturning a previous decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>