https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103604 The Court held that the Regional Director had jurisdiction to issue the order under section 22 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Court found no apparent illegality in the Regional Director's decision and declined to interfere, stating that the disputed facts were pending in a civil suit. The writ application was dismissed, with no costs awarded, and the prayer for a stay of the order's operation was refused. en-us Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:42:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103604 The Court held that the Regional Director had jurisdiction to issue the order under section 22 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Court found no apparent illegality in the Regional Director's decision and declined to interfere, stating that the disputed facts were pending in a civil suit. The writ application was dismissed, with no costs awarded, and the prayer for a stay of the order's operation was refused. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103604