<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 462 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103603</link>
    <description>A State Financial Corporation&#039;s power to enforce security under section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 must be exercised consistently with company liquidation proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956. Where winding-up is pending, the secured asset cannot be sold in disregard of the official liquidator, the pari passu rights of workmen and other secured creditors, or the court&#039;s supervisory control. The Corporation may proceed with sale only by associating the liquidator in the process and subject to confirmation by the court, although a different position may arise where possession was validly taken before winding up.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:40:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 462 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103603</link>
      <description>A State Financial Corporation&#039;s power to enforce security under section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 must be exercised consistently with company liquidation proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956. Where winding-up is pending, the secured asset cannot be sold in disregard of the official liquidator, the pari passu rights of workmen and other secured creditors, or the court&#039;s supervisory control. The Corporation may proceed with sale only by associating the liquidator in the process and subject to confirmation by the court, although a different position may arise where possession was validly taken before winding up.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>