<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 460 - HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103601</link>
    <description>The Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission allowed the appeal by the Postal Department against the District Forum&#039;s order in a case involving the Market Committee&#039;s complaint of deficiency in service related to the conversion of National Saving Certificates. The Commission held that the error in selling NSCs of the Sixth Issue instead of the Seventh Issue did not amount to deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act. The Postal Department was directed to pay the principal amount to the Market Committee, and the complaint was disposed of without awarding costs, emphasizing the importance of adhering to contractual obligations in government transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 460 - HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103601</link>
      <description>The Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission allowed the appeal by the Postal Department against the District Forum&#039;s order in a case involving the Market Committee&#039;s complaint of deficiency in service related to the conversion of National Saving Certificates. The Commission held that the error in selling NSCs of the Sixth Issue instead of the Seventh Issue did not amount to deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act. The Postal Department was directed to pay the principal amount to the Market Committee, and the complaint was disposed of without awarding costs, emphasizing the importance of adhering to contractual obligations in government transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>